You are here

Enviros Say Posting False Info On Fed Site Is Illegal

Born with that well-known genetic defect found in alt_R and most conservative types, cranium intra réctum, you were never destined to understand the real world beyond Disney Channel levels. We’re not interested in your useless babble.
the morons who were crying out about the coming ice age in the 70s An enduring popular myth suggests that in the 1970s the climate science community was predicting “global cooling” and an “imminent” ice age, an observation frequently used by those who would undermine what climate scientists say today about the prospect of global warming. A review of the scientific literature suggests that, on the contrary, greenhouse warming even then dominated scientists’ thinking as being one of the most important forces shaping Earth’s climate on human time scales. More importantly than showing the falsehood of the myth, this review describes how scientists of the time built the foundation on which the cohesive enterprise of modern climate science now rests. Peterson, Thomas C., William M. Connolley, John Fleck, 2008: The Myth of the 1970s Global Cooling Scientific Consensus. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 89, 1325–1337.
Weather is cyclical, the Middle Ages were much warmer than now, and we have entered a cooling phase. Weather is not climate and is not cyclical. Middle ages were not warmer, published science disagrees with you. The planet is indeed in a very long term cooling cycle (not phase) but yet it is undergoing warming at unprecedented rates (30x natural) due to human induced CO₂ into the atmosphere.
Most weather changes can be directly tied to activity on the sun TSI measures the total of all of the flux. It averages about 1361Wm⁻² on a surface perpendicular to the sun at the top of the atmosphere. TSI varies from peak to trough of the solar sunspot cycle by about 1Wm⁻². This means that the solar input is stable to within ± 0.5/1361 = ±0.04%. Four HUNDREDTHS of one percent. Insolation (incoming solar radiation at the surface (global 24/7 average) varies by about ±0.125Wm⁻² over the sunspot cycle. So the situation at the surface is the same, the variation in solar is trivially small. In a system where the input is stable to within ±0.04%, just exactly which measurements of solar are causing perturbations in the dynamic weather systems and long-term climate? NONE!

Related posts

Leave a Comment